• 博客访问:4603
    • 博文数量: 859
    • 用 户 组: 普通用户
    • 注册时间:2026-08-26
    • 认证徽章:
    个人简介

    苍天有泪

    文章存档

    08-24(8197)

    08-24(5937)

    08-22(4670)

    08-24(5895)

    翻译 2026-08-26

    分类: 名侦探柯南

    翻译

    我国载重最大货运列车运行试验成功_我的网站

    禁闭岛

    一 |     NEW DELHI -- India’s top court on Tuesday refused to legalize same-sex marriages, passing the responsibility back to Parliament in a ruling that disappointed campaigners for LGBTQ+ rights in the world's most populous country. Chief Justice DY Chandrachud also urged the government to uphold the rights of the queer community and end discrimination against them. Earlier this year, the five-judge bench heard 21 petitions that sought to legalize same-sex marriage. Chandrachud said there were degrees of agreement and disagreement among the justices “on how far we have to go” on same-sex marriages, but a majority of the judges agreed that the court cannot grant LGBTQ+ people the right to marry as that is a legislative function. “This court can’t make law. It can only interpret it and give effect to it,” the chief justice said, reiterating that it was up to Parliament to decide whether it could expand marriage laws to include queer unions.One of the petitioners, Mario da Penha, said it was “a day to be disappointed but not to lose hope.”“There's been tremendous work that has gone into these petitions, and many hopes and dreams of the queer community attached to them - to lead lives that most other Indians take for granted. The fact that the dream could not come to fruition today is a disappointment for all of us,” he said.He added that it was not yet clear if the court had set a mandate or timeline for Parliament to act. “Without that mandate, there is no pressure on Parliament to enact any legislation.”“There are queer couples today that are already families and in relationships, and are pillars of society. That they are not afforded the dignity and rights that they are due is deeply disappointing,” said Karuna Nundy, one of the lawyers representing the petitioners. Legal rights for LGBTQ+ people in India have been expanding over the past decade, mostly as a result of the Supreme Court’s intervention. In 2018, the top court struck down a colonial-era law that had made gay sex punishable by up to 10 years in prison and expanded constitutional rights for the gay community. The decision was seen as a historic victory for LGBTQ rights, with one judge saying it would “pave the way for a better future."Despite this progress, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government resisted the legal recognition of same-sex marriage and rejected several petitions in favor. During the hearings, the government argued that a marriage is only between a biological male and a biological woman, adding that same-sex marriages went against religious values and that the petitions reflected only “urban elitist views”. Religious groups too had opposed same-sex unions, saying they went against Indian culture.Adish Aggarwala, the president of the Supreme Court bar association, said the court had done the right thing by recognizing that this was a job for Parliament, an argument the government also made during the hearings. Lawyers for the petitioners argued that marriage is between two people, not just a man and woman. They said concepts of marriage have gradually changed with time and laws should acknowledge that. By not recognizing such unions, the government was depriving same-sex couples of their right to equality enshrined in the constitution and rights enjoyed by married heterosexual couples, from adoption and medical insurance to pensions and inheritance, they argued. “This court needs to push society to acknowledge same-sex marriage,” one of the lawyers said.Petitioners were hopeful that the Supreme Court could challenge the government’s position.But even as some of the justices urged that the state must make sure queer couples don't face harassment or discrimination in accessing basic needs, like opening a joint bank account, they stopped short of granting legal recognition to same-sex unions. Instead, the court accepted the government's offer to set up a special panel that will explore granting social and legal benefits to same-sex couples. Homosexuality has long carried a stigma in India’s traditional society, even though there has been a shift in attitudes toward same-sex couples in recent years. India now has openly gay celebrities and some high-profile Bollywood films have dealt with gay issues. According to a Pew survey, acceptance of homosexuality in India increased by 22 percentage points to 37% between 2013 and 2019.But same-sex couples often face harassment in many Indian communities, whether Hindu, Muslim or Christian.India is estimated to have at least 2.5 million LGBTQ+ people, according to government figures from 2012. However, gay rights activists and global estimates believe they number at least 10% of the population, or more than 135 million.In May, Taiwan became the first jurisdiction in Asia to recognize same-sex marriages. In July, Nepal's Supreme Court issued an interim order enabling the registration of same-sex marriages for the first time. It is still not clear when the court would make its final decision on the case.。    4月20日11时39分,朔黄铁路3万吨级重载列车55066次安全到达黄骅港站,标志着运行试验取得成功。这是我国目前编组最长、载重最大的重载组合列车。  据介绍,此次试验路线起点为朔黄铁路肃宁北站,终点为黄骅港。试验列车由4台国能号大功率交流电力机车牵引,编组324辆,总长4088米,总重32400吨。在朔黄铁路肃宁北站,准备开行的3万吨级重载列车。(受访单位供图)  记者了解到,此次3万吨重载列车运行试验采用新型无线宽带通信系统LTE-R、牵引网络控制、空气制动、无线同步操控等先进技术,是大功率交流电力机车与重载型货车车辆的生产要素创新搭配,实现3万吨重载列车在全自主技术应用领域的新突破。

    二 |   朔黄铁路是我国西煤东运第二大通道,担负着国家能源保供的重要使命。从2016年起,朔黄铁路开始常态化开行2万吨重载列车,目前开行列数已突破10万列,运输煤炭超11亿吨。

    三 | 朔黄铁路成功开行3万吨级重载组合列车,将对提升我国煤炭运输主通道运输能力、探索重载技术等方面具有积极作用。

    四 | (记者巩志宏)。

    Current article:http://www.rangnehongranlinren.bond/list_sw1ij/r7on.pptx

    Published on:08:13:12


    阅读756 | 评论422 | 转发466 |
    特搜战队刑事连者
    三毛流浪记

    邓北道乙08-22

    天才冲冲冲
    那一场呼啸而过的青春

    石道08-26

    城市猎人
    东京食尸鬼

    龙侯道扁08-23

    捉迷藏
    学警狙击

    平王卓08-20

    三少爷的剑
    匹诺曹

    辛杜开帝08-24

    奔跑吧兄弟
    春妮的周末时光

    建丁华秉08-25

    痞子英雄
    评论热议
    请登录后评论。

    登录 注册