说出你的故事
GT Voice: Backlash against US export licensing shows futility of containing China_我的网站
A | 1月16日消息今天，国家邮政总局宣布2018年邮政业的运营。2018年，邮政业营业收入（不含邮政储蓄银行直接业务收入）7904.7亿元，比上年增长19.4%，业务总量1234.5亿元，比上年增长26.4%。
Months-long American export license delays are costing the US billions in exports and eroding American market share globally, the US-China Business Council (USCBC) said in a flash survey released on Tuesday.
The survey noted that poorly calibrated US export controls weaken American companies in China, ceding market share to foreign competitors while reducing the profits available for research and development (R&D).
Designed originally to safeguard national security and serve legitimate foreign policy interests, the US export licensing system has become increasingly politicized, gradually turning into a political tool that obstructs normal economic and trade exchanges. The USCBC survey serves as a stark reminder of how such overreach has backfired on American companies.
In recent years, US politicians have clung to the misplaced belief that restricting exports of advanced goods and core technologies would slow the upgrading of China's tech industry and secure America's technological supremacy. Yet, they overestimated their leverage, while grossly underestimating the developmental resilience that China has built over decades of growth.
Today's China is no longer a passive follower or technology importer. Instead, it has grown into a robust innovation powerhouse with complete industrial chains and strong endogenous driving forces in numerous key technological sectors. Rather than stifling China's technological progress, America's escalating containment measures have only forced China to accelerate industrial upgrading and supply chain optimization.
In the meantime, while US politicians have been indulging in the illusion of building a "tech wall" through licensing restrictions, the self-inflicted damage to the US has grown increasingly impossible to ignore. Reuters reported in August 2025 that thousands of license applications by US companies to export goods and technology around the globe, including to China, were in limbo because turmoil at the agency in charge of approving them had left it nearly paralyzed.
The USCBC survey also listed license delays as the most common challenge identified by 95 percent of companies. For items bound for Chinese customers, two-thirds of companies have had licenses pending for at least three months, exceeding the US Commerce Department's statutory requirements to process applications within 90 days, and 31 percent have had licenses pending for one to two years.
As a result, American tech companies can only watch helplessly as orders that once belonged to them flow to suppliers in other countries. These licensing delays not only impose administrative costs far exceeding expectations, but also severely disrupt normal cross‑border commerce. From semiconductor components to high‑end industrial materials, and from aerospace ancillary products to cutting‑edge research instruments, countless routine trade transactions have been artificially severed. The market advantages that US firms took years to forge is being eroded by the very policies meant to protect them.
From a deeper economic perspective, the export licensing system is particularly lethal to America's innovation ecosystem. Usually, companies allocate a significant portion of their revenue to R&D and technological innovation. However, if the products resulting from these investments cannot be sold in a major market, investment returns will be affected, and the incentive for companies to continue investing in innovation will be undermined. As underscored by the USCBC survey, the export licensing regime diminishes America's ability to innovate and undermines US economic security.
In trying to contain China's industrial rise, the US has ended up undermining its own interests, laying bare the fundamental divide between two development paths. On one hand, the US attempts to fragment global industrial chains through administrative intervention, trade barriers and technological "decoupling" to sustain its dominant position. Yet, such obstructive practices only undermine the competitiveness of domestic industries and weaken America's own innovative vitality.
On the other side, China adheres to high-standard opening-up and win-win cooperation. By continuously opening its vast domestic market and providing foreign companies with a stable business environment, China has built a mutually beneficial global industrial collaboration network. China understands that genuine competitiveness comes from sustained independent innovation, sophisticated industrial supporting systems and market vitality. Precisely because China has chosen to expand openness and deepen cooperation, it has demonstrated remarkable resilience in the face of external containment and constructed a globally integrated supply network.
。根据国家邮政总局公布的数据，12月份，全行业实现营业收入763亿元，比上年增长16.7%，业务总量1279.6亿元，比上年增长26.2%。数据显示，2018年，邮政业务总量1988.8亿元，比上年增长17.3%；邮政业务总量237.5亿元，比上年增长0.5%；邮政业务总收入368.3亿元，比上年增长1.5%。比上年增长41%。12月，邮政业务完成186.5亿元，比上年同期增长17.2%；邮政业务完成20.4亿元，比上年同期下降1.1%；邮政业务收入完成29.4亿元，比上年同期下降5%。2018年，邮政通信业务完成26.8亿份，比上年下降15%；包裹业务完成2407万份，比上年下降9.4%；报纸业务完成172.9亿份，比上年下降2.3%；杂志业务完成790万份，比上年下降0.6%。上年完成交易2520万份，比上年下降32.7%。
B | 2018年，我国快递服务企业业务量507.1亿件，比上年增长26.6%，营业收入638亿元，比上年增长21.8%。其中，同一城市建成114亿1000万件，比上年增长23.1%；不同地区建成381亿9000万件，比上年增长27.5%；在国际、香港、澳门、台湾完成111亿件，比上年增长34%。12月，我国快递服务企业完成业务54.2亿件，比去年同期增长29%，实现营业收入609.6亿元，比去年同期增长17.3%。2018，同一城市、异地、国际/香港、澳门和台湾快递业务分别占快递业务总额的22.5%、75.3%和2.2%，营业收入分别占快递总收入的15%、51.4%和9.7%。与上年同期相比，同一城市快递业务比重下降0.6个百分点，各地快递业务比重提高0.5个百分点，国际/香港、澳门、台湾业务比重提高0.1个百分点。2018年，东部、中部和西部地区快递业务占比分别为79.9%、12.3%和7.8%，业务收入占比分别为80%、11.2%和8.8%。与去年同期相比，东部地区的快递业务比重下降1.2个百分点，快递业务收入比重下降0.9个百分点；中部地区的快递业务比重上升0.7个百分点，快递业务比重下降。场馆增长0.4个百分点；西部地区快递业务和快递业务收入占比增长0.5个百分点。
Current article:http://www.rangnehongranlinren.bond/wb1/qxizi7.doc
Published on:16:44:10